LBANK INFO CRYPTOCURRENCY

I have learned the hard way that even the most seasoned investors can fall prey to malicious actors. When my Investment was stolen, I felt a sense of betrayal and anger. But then, I discovered this FINANCE TEAM, and their professionalism and unwavering commitment gave me a renewed sense of confidence. From the moment I reached out to this Finance Team, I was impressed by their attention to detail and their deep understanding of the Stock and real estate ecosystem. They listened patiently to my story and carefully analyzed the transaction history, leaving no stone unturned in their investigation. Throughout the recovery process, This Finance Teamkept me informed of their progress, providing me with regular updates and answering my countless questions with patience and understanding. Their unwavering dedication and determination gave me a sense of hope during a time of great uncertainty. To my astonishment, This Finance Team was able to recover a significant portion of my stolen Investme

New to bitcoin, Im a little confused with this new area and try to set the bitcoin as saving to protect my assets being devalue. I learned from the bitcoin website that using Bitcoin Core to generate public and private key, the process is download official fies from web and copy to a new USB drive and put it in a new computer that completely offline, then run Core file in a offline operate system, (and avoid download the whole chain) and generate wallet key offline, after that, make a copy of wallet.dat, backup in 2 or 3 new usb drive and write my private key down. If come to saving coins,heres my question: 1.After finish creating the wallet, do i have to physics destroy my new computer? If i keep my new computer offline all time would i be able to keep my computer? 2.Due to the bitcoin core, If i only remember the private key but lost my .dat file, what happened to my wallet then? 3.Is Sparrow wallet better or friendly? Cuz bitcoin core need to copy the new .dat file if you want

I seeks a clear and actionable methodology to measure Bitcoin’s unique value creation compared to other cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and traditional financial systems. Specifically, they are asking: How can we reliably differentiate Bitcoin-specific value creation (e.g., from decentralization, censorship resistance) from general blockchain-based financial innovations? What measurable metrics or frameworks can demonstrate how Bitcoin’s decentralization translates into actual economic value, rather than simply describing potential benefits? How can Bitcoin’s value creation be compared to technology companies like Google, Tesla, or Amazon, whose market cap reflects their contribution to increasing the economy’s productive potential? Existing ideas in the conversation include analyzing remittance cost savings, transaction efficiency (e.g., Lightning Network), and financial inclusion through wallet adoption. However, these metrics often describe potential benefits rather than

new to bitcoin world and I got hooked up with a trader calling himself David O. Nelson and the website was MajorfxHawk. I have doubts to it’s authenticity especially when I incurred an upgrade fee when my $1,000 investment in 5 days earned $40,000 in profits. Repeatedly promised I would have access to profits as soon as I paid upgrade of $4,000. It wasn’t tue and that $5,000 investment had now earned $80,000. They just sent my profits to Coinbase wallet and I have a Withdrawal Mempool tax of nearly $4,000 which needs to be paid before I have access. I believe this is just another step in the scam. Paying this fee does not guarantee my money does it? My brain says if I pay, the profit will magically disappear. I would like to hear from more experienced traders. Thank you. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/d1U9eOF via IFTTT

CAN SOMEONE USE CONFIDENTIAL TRANSACTION ADRESS TO WITHDRAW "BTC"? enter link description here from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/FJVd9DE via IFTTT

An early backup of a Bitcoin wallet '. dat' is now being restored with the following error message: Wallet loading failed. The location of the wallet you previously used has been overwritten (outdated). Now, after fixing the error, you need to re-index (for already open wallets). Just re-download and update the new node. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/1xwkmC6 via IFTTT

(Note, please see EDIT below.) I title this with “arithmetic” because “mathematics” is an abstraction for arithmetic and a mathematical function can be broken down into arithmetic. I need the arithmetic. The top level question / goal: I am trying to understand the arithmetic in how a private key is translated into a public key. Presume my wallet has generated a private key for me. What are the steps the wallet (and/or the bitcoin nodes) use to create the public key that it uses to deposit coins into? I have found and read multiple articles, but am not recognizing the steps. But before going there, I need to solidify the meanings of a few symbols. Start with this post found from a search: What is the math behind Bitcoin's elliptic curve? Q, k I don’t know what these represent. G from another post I find this: “The generator point G, or a ECDSA public key, is a pair of coordinates x and y, for which the above equation holds.” I presume this mean some specific point on the curve,

I just received an invitation to go to bitcoin it directed me to payout section it only asks for email where to send the money. Wants to know account number it telling that I have 106000 the there the submit to manager is this legit also paystore ? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/HbSVR19 via IFTTT

Why does this testnet faucet Testnet faucet always say "Bots are not allowed here" on both my Android Chrome browser AND my iPhone Chrome browser ??? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/LDcd4sx via IFTTT

In the bitcoin-core reference client, CFeeRate::GetFee is a function of num_bytes . What is the smallest amount of num_bytes that a TxIn can be in practice as it pertains to calculating that inputs effective value? The reason I ask is that there are some test cases in the core wallet that use 150 bytes which seems unrealistic. The transaction calculator shows taproot as the most compact at 57.5 vB or 230 bytes I believe. The reason why 150 bytes is problematic is that it's difficult to faithfully reproduce that calculation using the rust-bitcoin framework for example, since the effective_value calculation implies at least inputs of 160 bytes due to the output and sequence size implicit in all effective_value calculations. Of course, a test could be made for 160 bytes instead which would probably have identical results, although I'm mostly curious why 150 bytes was selected here and if there's some practical oversight in the rust-bitcoin effective-value calculation.

I'm trying to understand the Bitcoin transaction creation process and how inputs and outputs work. From what I know, when a user creates a Bitcoin transaction, they typically select UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Outputs) as inputs to the transaction. Given this, it seems that the amount of the transaction is implicitly determined by the UTXOs selected, since the sum of the inputs is what gets spent. In other words, the total amount of Bitcoin being sent would be based on the value of the UTXOs used in the inputs, while the user doesn't need to explicitly specify the amount. Is that correct? Does the user really need to specify the amount at all, or is it entirely determined by the selected UTXOs? And if there's any difference, what is the role of specifying the amount in some wallet interfaces? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/zImtyc2 via IFTTT

I'm seeking ideas for very simple games involving sending/receiving Testnet Bitcoin? I'm gathering some noobs to show them how to send/receive bitcoin. Once we issue a coupla transactions, I was thinking it might be fun to turn it into a game to increase the learning. We're using Blockstream Green wallet to do this because it has an easy option for Testnet (thank you to r/Bitcoin for teaching me this). I'm prepared to send Testnet Bitcoin by virtue of these faucets: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Testnet#Faucets from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/lIZUqoO via IFTTT

The Premium Staking Plan is a special offer from Ultrapro Exchange for users who want exclusive benefits by staking 10,000 USDT worth of UPRO tokens. It’s limited to only 1,000 members, providing unique rewards, including an instant bonus, monthly returns, referral bonuses, and an invitation to the Dubai Crypto Expo 2025. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/eCPmc1w via IFTTT

Suppose A spends a UTXO of 5 BTC. The transaction is sent to the mempool. Will the 5 BTC UTXO be instantly deleted from the UTXO set? If no, can this UTXO still in the UTXO set be used to make another transaction? Can this UTXO be used while it is in the mempool (unconfirmed transaction)? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/uCSwGO2 via IFTTT

What is a startowerchain and what can it do? I found some information on the Internet, and I need the complete message now. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/GMvXruU via IFTTT

For the Bitcoin mainnet, I can easily fetch one block by following steps: Open the LevelDB database at <bitcoind-dir>/data/blocks/index Get by key: 629986b32020caeb48a421956936dd88dc8d7825441bbc96fec10e98b800000000 (hex) Just as an example. This is block #12345 with block hash 00000000b8980ec1fe96bc1b4425788ddc88dd36699521a448ebca2020b38699 . Transform it into the internal representation in bitcoin-core and prepend ASCII 'b' to it. Follow this answer and parse the value. I'm able to get: 8eed3c -- client_version (259900) df39 -- block_height (12345) 1d -- block_status (29) 01 -- tx_number (1) 00 -- blk_file (0) 80afc145 -- blk_start (2892101) 9fd565 -- rev_start (not care about this) 01000000 -- block_version df9c748f06fcb1e7a4152e76b974e8a5c51c235afb6044388260877600000000 -- prev_blockhash 5731362967a95ffbce2027abf78111e87e804aa8ad6b5b483bb96e827ac91dfd -- merkle_root 5cdff449 -- time ffff001d -- bits 1f35c72e -- nonce Open <bitcoind-dir>/block

Apply For your Reward. First 100 user: 4X Second 100 users: 2X Only Binance Please share your UsdT address. Please find out your number. @dogecoinplatform @TMECryptoNews2 https://www.dogecoinplatform.com/blog/1b-renewable-energy-bitcoin-farm-investment-in-el-salvador/47 from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/sKSoQLm via IFTTT

Ok I got scammed and hired a company to recover my money they have recovered it but there saying I need to pay 880 to get a good transaction speed does this sound right? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/vIsweyH via IFTTT

As far as I'm aware, the recovery code is presented to the user once and then not stored at all by the wallet, in which case, it has to store at least the master private key, and would also probably store all the addresses (as it would be inefficient to regenerate them each time they are needed) How exactly is all this stored? From here , I see that all addresses are identified using a path naming convention. Does that mean that all the paths are stored, and in a scenario where an address needs to be reused, it is regenerated each time? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/04tdVoz via IFTTT

Let's say Bob tells you to send him btc and he gives you a p2pkh address whose underlying 160-bit number is, say, 12345. You can't just convert that to the taproot representation of 12345 and send btc to that taproot address; Bob wouldn't receive that right? So, effectively, for any given 160-bit number, there are 4 different addresses you can generate from it, and sending btc to one address type would indeed send only to that address type, and the other 3 would not receive it? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/2x3TmPj via IFTTT

In Utreexo a validator node (fully validating Utreexo light node), when validating transactions, uses the proofs supplied by the proof-generator (a Utreexo-aware full node, bridge node). As far as I understand, for proof validation to succeed, the validator has to have the same accumulator state (same root hashes) as the state used when creating the proof. I wonder how can this be ensured in the different use cases. For the newly confirmed blocks/transactions, I see no problem, as the confirmed blocks and transactions have a well-defined ordering, and it is safe to assume to base the proof on the accumulator state as after the previous block. But what about a long-confirmed but still unspent UTXO? Relative to what state can it be proved/verified? Does a new current proof have to be created with the current block height? Or it's not possible in Utreexo? Also, what about mempool transactions? Their arrival time can differ in nodes, so there is no clear block height or block state.

Yes, it is possible to earn money from Genesis Cloud Mining, but it's essential to do thorough research, understand the risks, and have realistic expectations about potential earnings. If you're considering investing, make sure to weigh the costs, potential returns, and the volatility of the cryptocurrency market.I also staring to earn with that platform already. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/FKI9wCh via IFTTT

I lost my 12th word of my trust wallet 12 seed phrase Help me.just have phone. I don't have pc.trustwallet,multi chain wallet from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/dHRgj2Q via IFTTT

I saw there is a mining platform, but no have idea is it real or fake one, anyone have used it before? https://app.genesis-cloudmining.com from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/mCkzeGl via IFTTT

Online transfer (Southern Finland Province) service #uid-8hedbWttp5u4 Welcome back, user-id0797075376! Funds transfer initiated: Verify your request. Check details (Clickable) START_HASH SX-vCxldd4hzgLVVXRG8FebvN1vN1IqTt0u93 END_HASH Bitcoin Check: Receipt №: 49059988 Sender: Regional Online Bitcoin Payment Center Security HASH:SX-JkY3rkRffDOVFgUKRmd7sVZNYapnk5PSA3Um5q1iWZAapC49fOWTOkEG2r ⚠️ STORAGE TIME OF FUNDS: 24 hours! Best regards, Sophia Withdrawal Department E-Mail-Adresse * jls07419@hotmail.com How familiar would you say you are with the following concepts in cryptocurrency? Limited understanding with some familiarity Well-versed in the subject Average level of familiarity Expert-level comprehension Very well-informed Minimal understanding No knowledge at all What are the different mechanisms stablecoins use to maintain their value, and how do they peg to fiat or other assets? How does staking operate in cryptocurrencies, and what rewards and risks are involved in this p

My saga begins thus - February 2024 i make a series of deposits from my Trezor wallet to my newly formed Seedsigner/Sparrow Wallet/Bitcoin Core node using Seed-Words & Passphrase in BIP39, everything is good & i can signin & out of my new wallet with full balance showing after the transactions with Trezor,after this last viewing of those successful transactions i do not use that node again, i just left it running & never attempted to check the balance again until 2 days ago, in the last 9mths i have had another separate node running specifically in BTC Testnet, running weekly practice transactions for the sake of keeping up to speed, both nodes are HP T630 Thin Clients running Linux Debian 12, please note i updated all software including BTC Core/Seedsigner/Sparrow Wallet to the latest versions on time. The Crux is...when i decided to log into the Mainnet Node i forgot to change the setting on the Seedsigner from Testnet to Mainnet, so i entered the correct Seed & P

I have a btc wallet. It has hundreds of unknown transactions. I imported it into Electrum. I can freeze and unfreeze the wallet. I can receive I can partially send. I cannot sign however. Any help with this issue will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/OSCrvaD via IFTTT