LBANK INFO CRYPTOCURRENCY

My wife passed away in 2024 and I am trying to inquire into the process of retrieveing her account payout information. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/Ha1VciM via IFTTT

I have a transaction id a bitcoin amount was credited or sent me I dont ha e .y previous emails or phone numbers? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/F6JEmQx via IFTTT

From my reading I understand that: The Pi Cycle top indicator signals a top when: 111 day Moving average > 350 day Moving Average * 2 The Pi Cycle bottom indicator signals a bottom when: 150 day Exponential Moving Average <= .745 * 471 day Simple Moving Average The Pi Cycle bottom indicator then indicates the end of the bottoming zone when: 150 day Exponential Moving Average > .745 * 471 day Simple Moving Average My query is: Did I get the 3 inequalities right? I could not find a authoritative source on this, some of it is from AI and I am not sure it is precise . Can someone point me to the original or authoritative source? I hope I have not replaced < with <=, > with >= or vice versa. Thank you. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/ZHRSqn0 via IFTTT

Prediction markets are becoming an interesting intersection of blockchain technology, real-time data, and artificial intelligence. The basic idea is simple: participants make predictions about future events, while a reliable mechanism determines the eventual outcome. The difficult part is not necessarily creating the market—it is proving that the outcome used for settlement is accurate and trustworthy. Projects exploring AI-assisted prediction markets are bringing new attention to this problem. For example, Poly Truth explores the use of AI and blockchain technology to analyze prediction-market information. An overview of the project can be found here: https://cryptopresalenews.com/poly-truth-presale-connects-web3-projects-and-investors This also raises an interesting question from a Bitcoin perspective: could Bitcoin provide the settlement layer for a prediction market while minimizing the need to trust a centralized intermediary? Bitcoin's scripting system is in...

I created a musig descriptor with Bitcoin Core: My addresses: tpubDCWbaTx1wFG3JHpT5sK7HD2yBDLdoonfz7SN5Jnk3UGXf3EAMNECcDrGQQXP6jccdgcczRnSDTBAXauK19EAbf3KvnHmRCsKk2gGdWP3Xke tpubDCis6zc7jL21KnV9Rz7zRz2AsFartHsdQx9uVdnd2kVuNpCNX5mhHaMwYrR7YvdT3GKqKVKNDRSz966Z9DjXqUvyz7gHkfh751GBJ68CYab The keys were master keys from other wallets. Here was my descriptor: tr(musig(tpubDCWbaTx1wFG3JHpT5sK7HD2yBDLdoonfz7SN5Jnk3UGXf3EAMNECcDrGQQXP6jccdgcczRnSDTBAXauK19EAbf3KvnHmRCsKk2gGdWP3Xke,tpubDCis6zc7jL21KnV9Rz7zRz2AsFartHsdQx9uVdnd2kVuNpCNX5mhHaMwYrR7YvdT3GKqKVKNDRSz966Z9DjXqUvyz7gHkfh751GBJ68CYab)/<0;1>/*) No problem with importing or deriving addresses: $ bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet=musig importdescriptors '''[{ "desc": "'$DESC_WITH_CS'", "timestamp": "now" }]''' [ { "success": true, "warnings": [ "Range not given, using default keypool range" ] } ] $ bit...

Bitcoin Knots 29.3, single descriptor wallet managed by Sparrow, four 2-of-3 multisig wallets registered in it. Three transactions from one multisig don't appear in the Knots GUI transaction list. Ten from another, created the same way a day later, display normally. All are self-transfers between two wallets in the same node wallet. Comparing gettransaction output for a working and a non-working transaction: every top-level field matches in shape — same fee value, amount: 0 , empty walletconflicts and mempoolconflicts , bip125-replaceable: no , correct confirmations. The only difference in the entire object is that details is populated on one (a send and a receive entry) and [] on the other. The fee is correct on both, which I take to mean input ownership was resolved. That's the part I don't understand — how does the wallet compute a fee and then produce no detail entries? Other checks on the non-working wallet: getaddressinfo on the destinations...