LBANK INFO CRYPTOCURRENCY

Bonjour à tous, est-ce que quelqu’un ici connaît Trade GPT ? J’ai vu plusieurs sites et je ne sais pas lequel est le bon. Est-ce que le site officiel est bien https://www.tradegpt-ia.com/ ? Si certains l’ont déjà utilisé, je serais intéressé par vos avis. Merci d’avance ! from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/twKvbn1 via IFTTT

This might sound like a dumb question, but bear with me — it's a real one With traditional bank transfers in a business context, it's standard practice to attach a reference to the transaction (invoice number, customer ID, etc.) so that both parties can reconcile it against their accounting ledgers. I know the recommended practice with Bitcoin is to generate a fresh address per transaction/invoice, which gives you both better privacy (and arguably quantum resistance) and unambiguous reconciliation. Still, that only works when you control the receiving side. The Bitcoin network supports embedding additional data in transactions (OP_RETURN), and EVM chains have the calldata/input data field. So why is it so uncommon for applications — not just browser wallets — to let the sender attach a reference when sending funds? If blockchain payments are ever going to reach mainstream business adoption, this seems as obviously useful as a bank payment reference. I'm ask...

Look, engaging with the authorities is a marathon, not a sprint. By methodically filing these reports, you’re not just fighting for your own funds—you’re contributing to the broader battle against crypto crime. For a deeper dive into what to do after a theft, check out (Reclaimeasy At Gmail C0m) for complete guide on how to recover stolen crypto from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/fMJ27Xm via IFTTT

In the bitcoin-core codebase, it seems that discard fee-rate and long-term fee-rate are used interchangeably when computing the cost of change. Consider the following code excerpts: cost_of_change = discard_feerate.GetFee(change_spend_size) + effective_feerate.GetFee(change_output_size); ref: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2990bd773551c835ab0b6b59d85730adab2fd428/src/wallet/spend.cpp#L1182 and also: cost_of_change = effective_feerate.GetFee(change_output_size) + long_term_feerate.GetFee(change_spend_size); ref: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/2990bd773551c835ab0b6b59d85730adab2fd428/src/wallet/test/fuzz/coinselection.cpp#L96 In both of these snippets, the cost_of_change is being computed, however, one uses the long-term fee-rate while the other uses the discard fee-rate. Are these two terms actually distinct or can they be used interchangeably? To my knowledge, cost_of_change should be calculated using the discard fee_rate, and the long_term fee_r...

Following up from Is it a bug that OP_IF is part of the Tapscript opcodes? : BIP110 proposes to forbid OP_IF and OP_NOTIF in leaf scripts. However, old UTXOs are grandfathered in, so the new rules would only apply to UTXOs created after its activation. How could this still create issues for users? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/wWk7KIQ via IFTTT

I want to set up the latest Bitcoin Core version to mine a block that is valid after the BIP-110 is activated (two months from now). What are the steps to do at minimum? I want to make sure that a block is not rejected by the Bitcoin P2P network. BIP-110 specification: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.mediawiki from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/khDYz8c via IFTTT