Posts

Tangem Wallet Pack of 2 - Secure Crypto Wallet - Trusted Cold Storage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT's &

Tangem Wallet Pack of 2 - Secure Crypto Wallet - Trusted Cold Storage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT's &
Key item features Ultimate Security: Generates a private key that remains on the card, safeguarding crypto and NFTs from hackers with EAL6+ certification and audited firmware. Versatile Compatibility: Manages over 13,000 tokens across 70+ blockchains, supporting DeFi, NFTs, and DeEx without wires, Bluetooth, or USB. Effortless Operation: Utilizes NFC for secure transactions via a mobile device and the Tangem app, enabling buying and selling crypto with various payment methods. Smart Backup: Features a second Tangem Wallet as a backup, eliminating the need for paper, pictures, or seed phrases for recovery. Durable Design: Boasts IP68 protection against environmental conditions, ensuring longevity and robust physical security. Comprehensive Support: Compatible with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, USDT, and over 6,000 cryptocurrencies, integrating with dApps and WalletConnect.

Should a watch-only Bitcoin wallet descriptor be treated as a secret backup?

I'm setting up a Bitcoin wallet where the signing keys remain offline, while an online machine only has a watch-only output descriptor. For example, the online wallet may contain an account xpub together with the master fingerprint, derivation path and address type, but it has no seed or private keys. I understand that someone who obtains the descriptor cannot directly sign transactions, but they may be able to derive the wallet's addresses and monitor its transaction history. I'm trying to understand the exact security boundary here: What information can an attacker learn from a watch-only descriptor alone? Does leaking the descriptor create any direct risk of losing funds, or is it only a privacy risk as long as no private key is exposed? If one non-hardened child private key were later compromised, could the account xpub contained in the descriptor then be used to recover the corresponding account private key? Does the hardened account boundary protect t...
Read more

LBANK

LBANK

It would be interesting to develop a Linux distribution based on Bitcoin network technology, blockchain, and DeFi platforms

Image
OLA COMUNIDADE TENHO UMA IDEIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO GOSTARIA DE SABER SE É INTERESSANTE OU JA EXISTE ALGO PARECIDO. UMA DISTRIBUIÇAO LINUX BASEADA EM STABECOINS ONDE TERA PROGRAMAS PARA MINERAÇAO EM REDE DE CRIPTOMOEDAS EM DIFERENTES REDES, CARTEIRAS, MONITORAMENTO DE MINERAÇAO, ESPAÇO PARA DESENVOLVERORES,INTEGRAÇAO COM SISTEMAS DE IA, DESENVOLVIMENTO PARA SMART CONTRACTS E MAIS ALGUMAS COISAS RELACIONADA A TECNOLOGIAS WE3. UM PROJETO DESSA MAGNITUDE SERIA INTERESSANTE PARA AS COMUNIDADES CRIPTOMOEDAS E BITCOIN? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/fR8HtkJ via IFTTT
Read more

Why did my Knots node follow the BIP-110 soft-fork? How do I make it follow the longer chain?

Image
My Knots full node seems to have stopped receiving blocks after 961636, which seems to indicate it followed the BIP-110 * soft-fork: bitcoin-cli getchainstates returns: { "headers": 961636, "chainstates": [ { "blocks": 961636, "bestblockhash": "0000000000000000000216a2691f8b2b7b2275b0ce6131cf4e8c0fe5361fb9c0", "bits": "1702353d", "target": "00000000000000000002353d0000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "difficulty": 127479855693691.4, "verificationprogress": 0.9999767532445456, "coins_db_cache_bytes": 8388608, "coins_tip_cache_bytes": 17169383424, "validated": true } ] } (Why does verificationprogress ≠ 1, anyway?) " BIP110 Situation Monitor: Live " shows this: What about Bitcoin Knots made it follow the BIP-110 fork? Is there a way I can make ...
Read more

What would be a drawback if sum instead of SHA-256 of amounts was used the TapRoot signature message?

Would there be any drawback of using sum of amounts instead of SHA-256 of amounts in the TapRoot signature message? There is the sha_amounts (32): the SHA256 of the serialization of all input amounts. specified in the BIP-341: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki#common-signature-message . SHA-256 seems more expensive than e.g. sum_amount (8): sum of all input amounts . from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/T21IoCn via IFTTT
Read more

HYDRA ($HYDR) is the meme project of the Radix DLT ecosystem

HYDRA ($HYDR) is the meme project of the Radix DLT ecosystem, built as a community-driven memetic expression of the “Radix Rebirth.” It presents itself as a many-headed movement where the community sets the direction and builders execute. What makes HYDRA interesting is that it is not trying to look like a traditional utility-heavy token first. It leans into identity, community energy, and ecosystem culture, which is often how strong meme projects begin to gain attention. Why HYDRA Gets Attention HYDRA is listed in Radix ecosystem directories and token pages as a Radix-native memecoin, with the contract/resource address shown on public listings. That makes it easier for users to verify the token’s presence inside the Radix network instead of relying only on social hype. The project narrative is simple: community first, builders second, and future utility to be revealed over time. That kind of framing usually appeals to traders who follow memes, ecosystem culture, and e...
Read more

Schildbach Bitcoin Wallet 2014-2016

Currently seeking advice on where and how to access my Shildbach bitcoin wallet from 2016. I have access to my encrypted private keys and I know my password. Just curious because this site was also listed in my backup email I had saved. Not exactly sure how to go about my next step. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/6D4iehO via IFTTT
Read more

Where can i go to resolve this transaction on a puzzle?

i have solved a bitcoin wallet puzzle... but i cant do the final transaction. i would like to know where i can take it that inst going to screw me over.. I have had it solved for well over 1 year and have asked for help whcih falls on deaf ears and would be ashame to lose it due to other people being lame and not assisting.. It took me 8 years to solve and would like to bring it to a close. its not a offical puzzle but indeed is one .. i would love pieter wullie or another pundit to assist on the last aspect. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/S1L5Z2O via IFTTT
Read more