LBANK INFO CRYPTOCURRENCY

What happens if Bob keeps the Musig2 nonces used in the last multisig transaction? Can Bob use Alice's disclosed nonces to steal monies from the second transaction? I would say no since the second transaction would use different unspent inputs than the first transaction. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/3znZXTW via IFTTT

I have used bitcoinj v0.2 From wich I have a base64 string of 12 bytes 16 characters and a base58 string of 34 characters that is 25 bytes. it has a xor test in that string so I have a matching 10 bytes from the base64 string with a matching 16 bytes from that base58 string But how do I use them? Is this aes-128? so the 16 bytes is a encrypted seed? Or do I have to join then togheter to get a 26 bytes raw private key It's from the time before WIF thanks from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/xJ34Lh2 via IFTTT

I ran a CSFS experiment on Bitcoin Inquisition Signet and got a spend confirmed: https://mempool.space/signet/tx/cc1b6d352f75348b6a52c7f5c68fc5caea2512423e08011e8f69a9bb85195f97 The tapscript is simply: <pubkey> OP_CHECKSIGFROMSTACK The witness provides (sig, msg, script, control_block) . Since (sig, msg) becomes public after spending, if another UTXO is later sent to the same script, anyone could reuse the exact same pair to spend it — because CSFS only enforces: schnorr_verify(pubkey, msg, sig) with no commitment to the spending transaction. By contrast, OP_CHECKSIG signatures commit to the input outpoint, so cross-UTXO reuse is impossible. This leads to three questions: Is cross-UTXO signature reuse an intentional property of CSFS, or a risk that must be handled at the script level? What are the standard patterns to prevent unintended reuse — include the outpoint in msg ? combine with OP_CHECKSIG ? In oracle constructions where reuse is desirable (e.g., attesting...

my original Email address: alstone777@rocketmail.com I had a message a couple years ago t: theartmonster777@gmail.com I purchased bitcoin in 2010, 10 dollars worth, and it is worth a lot now I might of used paypal to purchase this bitcoin from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/5UkjpbO via IFTTT

Taproot is often described as making Bitcoin “more programmable”. However, Bitcoin still executes the same stack-based Script VM, without loops or persistent state. Taproot increased expressiveness without changing the VM. What specific protocol changes made this possible? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/4ePhoXU via IFTTT

I need help trying to update my wallet info mation before they close my account I keep getting emails from Google forms saying to update my Bitcoin wallet info but it wont tell me we're to go to do it from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/P8OKXQw via IFTTT