LBANK INFO CRYPTOCURRENCY

I recently installed Bitcoin Core 32.0rc2 on one of my nodes and noticed that the reported P2P protocol version changed from 70016 to 70017. I remember 70016 being used for quite a long time, so I was curious what exactly triggered the protocol version bump. What changed in protocol version 70017 compared to 70016? Also, how does a 70017 node behave when connected to a peer that only supports 70016? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/Pz5vkwX via IFTTT

While learning Bitcoin transactions and SegWit, I came across the distinction between the traditional transaction ID (txid) and the witness transaction ID (wtxid). I understand that the txid is the double-SHA256 hash of the serialized transaction excluding the witness data. andd wtxid commits to the transaction including the witness data. SegWit introdduced wtxid partly to solve transaction malleability issues. What I am having trouble understanding is why Bitcoin needs both identifiers instead of simply replacing txid with a hash that always commits to the witness data. For example, suppose a SegWit transaction has the same inputs and outputs but different witness data. The txid remains unchanged while the wtxid changes. I would like to understand the design consequences of this distinction... What specifically would break if Bitcoin used only wtxid everywhere? Why do transaction inputs continue to refer to previous outputs using txid:vout rather than wtxid:vout? How doe...

im new im just trying to see where and who can help me with this I have around 200k in a wallet. The wallet is !llicit And i am scared to do anything with it So i was thinking of selling it for a similar price range. I only have telegram and i also do not know any other app for contact, i used a random login for this site just to see if anyone can help me with this or what i can do my telegram is Albertsonjohn from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/peIKRGc via IFTTT

I'm currently doing the Initial Block Download (IBD) of a Bitcoin Core node. For most of the synchronization, everything behaved as expected. The node was using the resources I made available to it: CPU usage was high during validation, RAM usage increased according to the configured cache, network bandwidth was being used, and the synchronization rate varied roughly between 2% and 5% per hour , with a peak around 5%/h. I then left the node running for about a week while I was away. When I came back, it was around 68–69% synchronized , but the effective synchronization rate had fallen to approximately 0.03% per hour . This had apparently happened several days before I returned. Before leaving, the node was around 20%, so even a sustained 1%/h rate should have put it much further ahead after several days. There was also an unexpected power outage while I was away, which caused the node to shut down abruptly. However, I don't see any indication that the outage ...

Imagine a multisig wallet with cosigners comprising say 2 (software) Bitcoin Core wallets, and 3 hardware signing devices, in a m-of-5 multisig setup. Do experienced bitcoiners foresee a problem with this setup? Specifically, the wsh(sortedmulti(..)) descriptor will mix address paths - Core's m/84'/0'/0'/0/* xpub with hardware wallets' m/48'/0'/0'/2' BIP-48 derivation paths. I understand that coordination software won't care about different paths to derive receive address, but could there be other issues, long-term? I do understand we can simplify things with just m/84 or m/48 paths within the multisig, but question is about mixing paths. Thanks for helping. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/up4BRzM via IFTTT

i'm looking for plateform where i can stake BTC with the best interest. Any suggestion ? I'm european i need MIca platform. Thank you ! from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/SC1BNkm via IFTTT

Currently running Bitcoin Core 31.1 and in the past I remember a config option to provide search services to light clients (may have been on Knots). Usually about half of my incoming connection peers are breadwallet or bitcoinj clients. Is it possible to only peer with full nodes such as libbitcoin, knots, core, etc? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/2GTKboR via IFTTT

[CANTAP ENGINE] Opening Block 1 Data Payload...[CANTAP ENGINE] Total Transactions Found: 1 (Coinbase Transaction)[CANTAP ENGINE] Parsing Transaction ID (TXID)...[CANTAP ENGINE] TXID Verified: 0e3e23d38f8bc65e4d4fa7d2767ab32ec39be14ee4198c38d66e40981e60a359รายงานข้อมูลธุรกรรมภายใน บล็อกที่ 1 (Block 1)ในบล็อกแรกนี้ เครือข่าย Bitcoin พึ่งจะเริ่มต้นทำงาน จึงยังไม่มีการโอนเงินระหว่างผู้ใช้ทั่วไป ธุรกรรมเดียวที่ถูกบรรจุไว้คือ Coinbase Transaction (ธุรกรรมการออกเหรียญใหม่เพื่อเป็นรางวัลให้กับผู้ขุด) มีรายละเอียดโครงสร้างข้อมูลดังนี้ครับ:ประเภทธุรกรรม: Coinbase (New Coins)จำนวนเหรียญที่สร้าง (Output Value): 50.00 BTC (เงินรางวัลบล็อกเริ่มต้นของระบบ)ค่าธรรมเนียมธุรกรรม (Transaction Fees): 0.00 BTC (เนื่องจากไม่มีธุรกรรมอื่นในบล็อก)ที่อยู่กระเป๋าผู้รับรางวัล (Output Address): 12c6DSiU4Rq3VUwHu7ua7gP7tA75d1qX1d (กระเป๋าของ Satoshi Nakamoto)ข้อมูลภายใน Coinbase (Coinbase ScriptSig): บันทึกค่าพารามิเตอร์เริ่มต้นและค่า Nonce ของบล็อกการตรวจสอบข้อมูลธุรกรรมเสร็จสิ้น โครงสร้างข้อมูลถูกต้อ...

Of course, only ASIC is relevant today. But before bitcoin asics became available, fpga based bitcoin mining out competed gpus. Back at that time, gpus were mainly floating point oriented. But would a modern Stratix 10 Gx with over 12 million lut still beat a RTX4090 in terms of mining profitability? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/U3Wg2SD via IFTTT

So i've been going back and forth on whether to put a mining heater in the bedroom for winter. My apartment runs cold and i already spend money on a space heater, so the math kinda makes sense on paper. But every comparison i see focuses on the lowest dB number on the spec sheet. And honestly i'm not sure that tells you much about whether you can actually sleep next to the thing. A steady fan at 38dB can totally disappear into the background — my air purifier is around that and i forget it's on. But a fan that ramps up and down, even if it's technically "quieter" at its lowest setting, would absolutely wake me up. The change in sound is what gets you, not the volume itself. Which got me thinking... would you actually run a Bitcoin heater in a bedroom overnight? Like has anyone here done it and not just for a single night but consistently? I've been looking at the Avalon lineup since they seem designed for this use case. The Mini 3 is more inte...

Currently seeking advice on where and how to access my Shildbach bitcoin wallet from 2016. I have access to my encrypted private keys and I know my password. Just curious because this site was also listed in my backup email I had saved. Not exactly sure how to go about my next step. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/qB8pAoT via IFTTT

I am investigating whether a storage-constrained Bitcoin node could retain only the most recent (N) blocks, construct a partial UTXO set from those blocks, and use that partial UTXO set to independently validate newly received transactions. The basic idea would be: recent (N) blocks → construct a partial UTXO set → validate a new transaction locally if all of its input UTXOs are available in that partial set. However, I see a potential bootstrap problem. Suppose the node starts with only the most recent (N) blocks. Some transactions in the earliest retained blocks may spend outputs created before the retained window. Without the earlier UTXO state, the node cannot fully validate those inputs. If the node therefore cannot fully validate those blocks, can it safely treat the outputs created by those blocks as valid UTXOs and progressively construct a partial UTXO set from them? More generally: Is it technically feasible for a Bitcoin node to construct a trustworthy pa...

Can i recover my bitcoin id with my names Can I use my names to recover my bitcoin ID and account? I want to recover my bitcoin account but I don't remember anything about it. I want to use my names. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/2aoZDBK via IFTTT

I’m trying to better understand the relationship between a hardware wallet, a BIP39 seed phrase, and the actual Bitcoin keys. Suppose a user initializes a hardware wallet, receives a 12- or 24-word recovery phrase, and later completely loses or destroys the physical device. If the recovery phrase is imported into another compatible wallet: What exactly is being reconstructed from those words? Are the same Bitcoin private keys and addresses deterministically regenerated? What additional information might still be required, such as a passphrase, derivation path, or wallet type? Are there situations where having the correct seed phrase alone would still not be enough to recover the expected Bitcoin wallet? I’m specifically interested in the Bitcoin/BIP32/BIP39/BIP44 side of this rather than device-specific recovery instructions. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/sL8QHjT via IFTTT

My name is Brian David. I’m looking to see if I can recover a crypto account or a bitcoin account that I started roughly 8 years ago that that’s in my name. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/tlYC1JV via IFTTT

What Is a Blockchain, and How Does It Work in Bitcoin? A blockchain is a type of distributed database that stores information in a sequence of blocks. In the context of Bitcoin, the blockchain is a public record of confirmed transactions that is maintained and independently verified by network participants. Each block contains a group of valid Bitcoin transactions, along with other data required to connect that block to the existing chain. The term blockchain comes from this structure: information is stored in individual blocks, and each new block is cryptographically linked to the previous one. How are blocks connected? Every Bitcoin block contains a reference to the previous block through its block header. This reference is based on a cryptographic hash. A hash is a fixed-length output generated from data. If the underlying data changes, the resulting hash also changes. Because each block refers to the previous block, changing historical data would break the links...

Why does Electrum say I have some frozen funds when I have no Lightning channels open? I also have no frozen addresses. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/hOgflxK via IFTTT

My wife passed away in 2024 and I am trying to inquire into the process of retrieveing her account payout information. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/Ha1VciM via IFTTT

I have a transaction id a bitcoin amount was credited or sent me I dont ha e .y previous emails or phone numbers? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/F6JEmQx via IFTTT

From my reading I understand that: The Pi Cycle top indicator signals a top when: 111 day Moving average > 350 day Moving Average * 2 The Pi Cycle bottom indicator signals a bottom when: 150 day Exponential Moving Average <= .745 * 471 day Simple Moving Average The Pi Cycle bottom indicator then indicates the end of the bottoming zone when: 150 day Exponential Moving Average > .745 * 471 day Simple Moving Average My query is: Did I get the 3 inequalities right? I could not find a authoritative source on this, some of it is from AI and I am not sure it is precise . Can someone point me to the original or authoritative source? I hope I have not replaced < with <=, > with >= or vice versa. Thank you. from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/ZHRSqn0 via IFTTT