Importing Correct Scalar/Private key - Result not correct USING A DIFFERENT DERIVATION PATH

If anyone can help me resolve this i would be most greatful....

Issue is CORE IS USING A DIFFERENT DERIVATION PATH....

So i have broken this down to the X/Y pair scalar and can validate key 123 which corrlates to address ABC ..... this is on normal generation points and can walk the key displaying both comp and uncomp results which is correct... its the only value able to do so.

When i go to import this WIF into core it displays another address. import 123 comes to DEF... but this is not correct as the math and libs show the ABC result. I dont know why its using another derivation path currently, when back years years years ago it worked fine as there are send txns etc etc.. .

Trying to figure out how to make this work, i can change the Generation points to reflect the keys gen points and then it will map it out correctly also but modifying this is not allowed in core consensus rules so i am not sure how to apply that fix... the XY does change on that aspect but comes out correct.

No matter what i do this proven valid 100% correct scalar wif raw hex whatever level you want to use is imported as DEF ... and its not correct when it should be ABC. The type is p2pkh-p2sh and was created prior to compression being adopted.

I dont know the comamnds purse to import a key in early core anymore as it was toggles on the exe string. Would this resolve the importing issue? ... ive tried electrum and maybe there is a specific script via console to force it to see the correct address?

So 123 IS correct and maps to ABC 1xxx umcomp 123 IS correct and maps to ABC 1xxx comp Private key mathematically gens the public Q that maps to the corrlated addys...

THE CONTRACICTION Core says importing 123 gives address DEF BUT as per math should give ABC

The only solution i have is that at some point Bitcoin Core descriptor wallets use different address derivation than simple WIF imports. When you use importdescriptors, Bitcoin Core might be deriving addresses differently.

Since its not the correct addy i cant dump the correct values if i tried... There was a importdesc bug and i think this is one of the victims ..

i can try too importing with wpkh (Witness PKH) instead of pkh (doubt it will work) i can try Use Raw Public Key Descriptor .. no idea how as i havent done that before Emergecy solution is to try and use py only to create a txn directly ... but it will wont see the correct value when uploaded i feel...

IS there any working solution anyone can provide? This might be a dev issue or at this point i really dont know what to do ... please advise or suggest options if there is a version of software or way to go about this... thank you!! ugh...

ps - the only work around i have found is the following procedure bypasses the WIF import ambiguity and directly instructs Bitcoin Core on the exact P2PKH rule to use for the known public key, which is the only way to solve this specific configuration conflict. --- ugh my cli never works so i guess ill try that unless there is another way in another software ... if anyone has come across this ever...



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/lnIhaVb
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Bitwise Clients Pour $69M Into Solana as Bulls Fight to Reclaim $200 Resistance Zone

Image
Institutional confidence in Solana (SOL) continues to surge as Bitwise clients invest a massive $69.5 million, supporting the blockchain as a frontrunner among alternative Layer-1 assets. The investment shows a growing appetite for scalable, low-cost blockchain solutions beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. Solana has been one of 2025’s standout performers, supported by its lightning-fast transaction speeds, affordable fees, and expanding DeFi and Web3 ecosystems. The Bitwise allocation signals institutional validation of Solana’s infrastructure and future potential, particularly as adoption accelerates tokenized asset markets. On-chain metrics reveal heightened activity, transaction volumes, developer participation, and staking inflows are all climbing. This combination of technological strength and real-world integration reinforces investor optimism, even as short-term volatility tests the $200 resistance level. Bitwise Expands Its Institutional Crypto Strategy Bitwise Asset Management’...
Read more

The XRP Roadmap: Ripple President Reveals The Next Big Steps

Image
As Ripple expands its offerings and operations to broader markets, the crypto company’s President, Monica Long, has unveiled its next phases of growth that could set the stage for a new era for XRP. The suggested roadmap points toward expanded innovation, deeper institutional adoption, and a broader role for the XRP Ledger (XRPL) in the global financial sector. Ripple’s President Outlines Next Chapter For XRP At the Ripple Swell 2025 event, held on November 4-5, Long shared the company’s ambitious roadmap for XRP , giving the crypto community a glimpse of Ripple’s future ecosystem plans. Speaking with CoinDesk, she explained that Ripple’s vision extends well beyond payments, focusing on developing a robust infrastructure that promotes financial inclusion globally.  According to the Ripple President, the crypto payments company now runs two main parts of its business. One division focuses on helping financial institutions adopt digital assets , while the other is dedicated to ...
Read more

Here’s When The First Dogecoin ETF Is Expected To Go Live – It’s Soon

Image
Dogecoin is now moving closer than ever to joining the roster of cryptocurrencies with their own US-listed exchange-traded funds, and the timeline for the first launch is becoming clearer.  After a series of regulatory filings and updates from major fund issuers, analysts now believe that the debut of the first Spot Dogecoin ETF is just days away. All signs now point to a launch window that could open as early as Monday, bringing the long-anticipated product to market far sooner than many expected . Grayscale Positions Its Dogecoin ETF For A Close Launch The clearest signal came after Grayscale updated its Dogecoin ETF filing, which started a 20-day countdown under the SEC’s new fast-track listing rules. These rules allow certain crypto ETFs to go live without the lengthy and restrictive approval process that previous products faced.  Unless the SEC steps in with an objection, the end of this 20-day window will become the launch date of the proposed ETF. Based on the timi...
Read more