SQLite not found when compiling bitcoin-core v29.0 with wallet mode

I have installed SQLite3 from the docs of Bitcoin Core.

Ubuntu x86_64 24.4.2 LTS AMD Ryzen 7

yuvic@yuvic-ulinux:~/bitcoin$ cmake -B build -DENABLE_WALLET=ON -DSQLite3_ROOT=/usr
-- Could NOT find Doxygen (missing: DOXYGEN_EXECUTABLE dot) 

Configuring secp256k1 subtree...
-- Could NOT find Valgrind (missing: Valgrind_INCLUDE_DIR Valgrind_WORKS) 


secp256k1 configure summary
===========================
Build artifacts:
  library type ........................ Static
Optional modules:
  ECDH ................................ OFF
  ECDSA pubkey recovery ............... ON
  extrakeys ........................... ON
  schnorrsig .......................... ON
  musig ............................... OFF
  ElligatorSwift ...................... ON
Parameters:
  ecmult window size .................. 15
  ecmult gen table size ............... 86 KiB
Optional features:
  assembly ............................ x86_64
  external callbacks .................. OFF
Optional binaries:
  benchmark ........................... OFF
  noverify_tests ...................... ON
  tests ............................... ON
  exhaustive tests .................... ON
  ctime_tests ......................... OFF
  examples ............................ OFF

Cross compiling ....................... FALSE
Valgrind .............................. OFF
Preprocessor defined macros ........... ENABLE_MODULE_ELLSWIFT=1 ENABLE_MODULE_SCHNORRSIG=1 ENABLE_MODULE_EXTRAKEYS=1 ENABLE_MODULE_RECOVERY=1 ECMULT_WINDOW_SIZE=15 COMB_BLOCKS=43 COMB_TEETH=6 USE_ASM_X86_64=1
C compiler ............................ GNU 13.3.0, /usr/bin/cc
CFLAGS ................................ 
Compile options ....................... -pedantic -Wall -Wcast-align -Wcast-align=strict -Wextra -Wnested-externs -Wno-long-long -Wno-overlength-strings -Wno-unused-function -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef
Build type:
 - CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE ................... Release
 - CFLAGS ............................. -O2 -g 
 - LDFLAGS for executables ............ 
 - LDFLAGS for shared libraries ....... 

CMake Error at src/wallet/CMakeLists.txt:46 (message):
  Wallet functionality requested but no BDB or SQLite support available.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!


yuvic@yuvic-ulinux:~/bitcoin$ pkg-config --modversion sqlite3
3.45.1


from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/BChqbt5
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Future of Bitcoin encryption and security in a QC era

How will the advancement of quantum computing impact the security of Bitcoin, and what steps are necessary to protect the network from this emerging threat? What role could lattice-based encryption play in safeguarding Bitcoin, and which of the current algorithms are best suited for this purpose? How would the implementation of such encryption technology be integrated into the existing Bitcoin infrastructure, and what challenges might arise during this process? What happens to existing addresses that rely on elliptic curve cryptography? Is there a way to seamlessly transition old addresses to the new system, or would users need to actively transfer their funds to new, more secure addresses? How could such a transition be designed to ensure user security while maintaining trust in the network? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/aZeY2fo via IFTTT
Read more

Possible rollback due to lazy reveal in BRC20?

Let's assume user A committed an inscription with {"op":"deploy", "tick": "test"} at block 100 (without revealing it yet). Then user B commits and reveals the exact same inscription at block 101. Because the indexer isn't aware that A's earlier commit was actually for "test," it recognizes B's "test" token as the official one. From blocks 101 to 199, users freely perform various "test" token transactions (e.g., "mint" , "transfer" ). However, at block 200, user A finally reveals their earlier commit. In that case, will the indexer roll back all "test"-related histories that happened between blocks 101 and 199? If so, can we really trust that all BRC20 tokens recognized by the indexer are "safely" the official ones? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/CsYKVTa via IFTTT
Read more

A way to recover scammed Bitcoin investment

I have learned the hard way that even the most seasoned investors can fall prey to malicious actors. When my Investment was stolen, I felt a sense of betrayal and anger. But then, I discovered this FINANCE TEAM, and their professionalism and unwavering commitment gave me a renewed sense of confidence. From the moment I reached out to this Finance Team, I was impressed by their attention to detail and their deep understanding of the Stock and real estate ecosystem. They listened patiently to my story and carefully analyzed the transaction history, leaving no stone unturned in their investigation. Throughout the recovery process, This Finance Teamkept me informed of their progress, providing me with regular updates and answering my countless questions with patience and understanding. Their unwavering dedication and determination gave me a sense of hope during a time of great uncertainty. To my astonishment, This Finance Team was able to recover a significant portion of my stolen Investme...
Read more