I accessed Satoshi Nakamoto's email after solving a cryptographic puzzle

Hello community I'm willing to pay 1 BTC to anyone who can prove this is fake.,

I want to share my story with you, which I believe deserves attention from those who deeply understand how Bitcoin works and the importance of its origins. My name is Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís, I'm from Arequipa, Peru, and I'm 30 years old. From a very young age, I realized I wasn't going to fit into the system. I never did well in school; I always passed with the minimum grade. My mind was always looking for something more. I didn't like the system, the governments, or the banks. I went to many psychologists, took many exams and tests, and later quit many jobs because I didn't fit in. That's how one day Bitcoin came to me and gave me what the traditional world couldn't: an opportunity. I immersed myself in technology to the limit, to the point of constantly updating the news every day. And although events like the one in China in 2017, the merger of Bitcoin and the S&P 500 markets, and other major indices that generated correlations and declines, occurred, the truth is that we survived, and we will survive. We absorbed Trump trying to ruin the crypto market, and we will survive BlackRock. That's why I stayed. Because Bitcoin isn't an asset, nor just money. If you think that, you're stuck at the first layer. Bitcoin is revolution, it's fighting the system, it's changing the status quo. I've come up empty many times for Bitcoin, and I don't regret it. Every decision I made brought me here. Now I need your support, because I can't do it alone.

Solving the Puzzle

For the past four years, I've analyzed the blockchain from the genesis block to many of Satoshi Nakamoto's earliest public transactions and communications. Using a purely mathematical approach, using combinatorial methods, binary pattern analysis, modular transformations, and other classical and quantum cryptography techniques, I was able to isolate what appear to be three master keys. On March 29, 2024, these keys allowed me to access, in a completely logical and reproducible (although not yet publicly provable) manner, the legendary email address: satoshin@gmx.com. I have been to numerous psychologists since I was a child. After telling my parents that I managed to access Satoshi Nakamoto's email after four years of research, they revealed that all those tests and sessions were to corroborate that I have an IQ of 145. My lawyers have advised me not to publicly reveal the procedure or the keys for the time being, as we are evaluating the legal framework for digital succession, international rights, and potential criminal or property implications. What I can affirm is that every step is documented and mathematically justified, from data collection to obtaining a working password. However, I have encrypted the email password in this very message in case anything were to happen to me. My family would contact the person with the correct password, and that person would pursue the case. I ignored my lawyers on this point because I believe this goes beyond legality: it's a matter of legacy and truth. As a small preview, I can tell you that the email password was in Spanish.

GMX and Satoshi's Account

I have direct messages with GMX confirming that I had access to the account. I had to provide information about the last access; they verified it in their database, and it matched. They responded specifically. We have up to three conversations where the email satoshin@gmx.com is directly mentioned, an email that is currently marked as nonexistent if you want to log in from gmx.net. I am the only person in the world who has had direct communication with GMX about this account. I'm convinced that a company like GMX would never admit to something like this without real evidence, otherwise it would represent a serious internal security breach. This is real and should be taken seriously. We must consider the impact it will have on the currency's value, so it should be treated with caution, not mockery. If you react with mockery, you're only revealing the envy you carry in your heart. If you're not envious and are serious, share the news, open a debate, don't stay silent. Give your point of view. Give your opinion. We're coordinating with a crypto newspaper that's investigating the case. I wanted to share the news with you first.

What's at Stake

I'm convinced that within that account are documents, private keys, and possibly access to more than a million bitcoins, which would currently exceed $70 billion. But beyond the economic value, what drives me is the hidden knowledge that Satoshi may have left behind, and which could transform our understanding of Bitcoin. I'm not seeking to profit from this information irresponsibly. My intention is to secure legal and institutional support so that the content can be shared with the community, publicly and verifiably, when the time is right. I'm currently seeking the support of lawyers specialized in Bitcoin, blockchain, and encryption, who can defend this case and help me regain access with a formal lawsuit against GMX, arguing for the right to digital succession under the European framework.

Ask the community

What impact would it have on the currency's value if it were confirmed that Satoshi potentially left 1 million bitcoins as a reward for whoever solved this encryption? How would this affect the current narrative about his identity, intent, and the future of decentralization in Bitcoin? Would this be seen as a legitimate succession, or would it open a legal and philosophical Pandora's box about ownership, merit, and technical access? I know many won't understand what's going on. Let me explain: Satoshi not only created Bitcoin, he also left a kind of game. A treasure chest, and that treasure chest was the email address mentioned in the white paper. The game consisted of solving the clues he left in his communications and thus finding the access to satoshin@gmx.com. Many focused solely on the asset; few understood the creator. Today, there is advanced research into trying to break Bitcoin's encryption and deduce private keys from public keys. But that is almost impossible; it requires immense computational power that we don't currently possess. However, what is possible is to deduce a password if the clues are there. And that's how I did it. We must keep in mind that Bitcoin had a centralized alert system; that is, Bitcoin once had a centralized component. Satoshi wanted to play on both concepts, as this could prevent major thefts and money laundering. However, this system was withdrawn between 2016 and 2018, perhaps to protect his money-laundering empire. I would deeply appreciate any guidance, ideas, or legal/technical references you could share. I'm aware of the impact this could have on the history of the project and the security of its foundations.

Photos from conversations with gmx https://x.com/paulllex2099/status/1913941173212791039 Sincerely, Paul Alexander Cárdenas Solís Contact: paullex2099@proton.me X: <enter image description herehttps://x.com/paulllex2099> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsE0KtttoBs



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/NmuhxWt
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Future of Bitcoin encryption and security in a QC era

How will the advancement of quantum computing impact the security of Bitcoin, and what steps are necessary to protect the network from this emerging threat? What role could lattice-based encryption play in safeguarding Bitcoin, and which of the current algorithms are best suited for this purpose? How would the implementation of such encryption technology be integrated into the existing Bitcoin infrastructure, and what challenges might arise during this process? What happens to existing addresses that rely on elliptic curve cryptography? Is there a way to seamlessly transition old addresses to the new system, or would users need to actively transfer their funds to new, more secure addresses? How could such a transition be designed to ensure user security while maintaining trust in the network? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/aZeY2fo via IFTTT
Read more

Possible rollback due to lazy reveal in BRC20?

Let's assume user A committed an inscription with {"op":"deploy", "tick": "test"} at block 100 (without revealing it yet). Then user B commits and reveals the exact same inscription at block 101. Because the indexer isn't aware that A's earlier commit was actually for "test," it recognizes B's "test" token as the official one. From blocks 101 to 199, users freely perform various "test" token transactions (e.g., "mint" , "transfer" ). However, at block 200, user A finally reveals their earlier commit. In that case, will the indexer roll back all "test"-related histories that happened between blocks 101 and 199? If so, can we really trust that all BRC20 tokens recognized by the indexer are "safely" the official ones? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/CsYKVTa via IFTTT
Read more

A way to recover scammed Bitcoin investment

I have learned the hard way that even the most seasoned investors can fall prey to malicious actors. When my Investment was stolen, I felt a sense of betrayal and anger. But then, I discovered this FINANCE TEAM, and their professionalism and unwavering commitment gave me a renewed sense of confidence. From the moment I reached out to this Finance Team, I was impressed by their attention to detail and their deep understanding of the Stock and real estate ecosystem. They listened patiently to my story and carefully analyzed the transaction history, leaving no stone unturned in their investigation. Throughout the recovery process, This Finance Teamkept me informed of their progress, providing me with regular updates and answering my countless questions with patience and understanding. Their unwavering dedication and determination gave me a sense of hope during a time of great uncertainty. To my astonishment, This Finance Team was able to recover a significant portion of my stolen Investme...
Read more