If "bitcoin is a virtual currency" as they say, why don't some people consider a pendrive as a "physical-virtual currency"?

A genuine question, if "bitcoin is a virtual currency" as they say, why don't some people consider a "pendrive" (a physical device that stores public-private keys to manage coins on a blockchain) as a "physical-virtual currency"?

For example, suppose Bob gives Alice a pendrive that contains 1 bitcoin. Alice exchanges his favorite programming book called: "Javascript" for 1 bitcoin contained on the pendrive.

how?

Alice(book) -> Bob (pendrive)
Bob(pendrive) -> Alice (book)

would this be considered a valid transaction (pendrive -> book) even though it is not on the blockchain? In this hypothetical scenario, was there a valid transaction even though nothing was done directly on the blockchain?



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/AEFIzi7
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Bitcoin Mining Could Be Strengthening The Ruble, Russian Central Bank Says

Crypto Exec Warns Tokenization Is Moving Faster Than Expected

Bitwise Clients Pour $69M Into Solana as Bulls Fight to Reclaim $200 Resistance Zone