Not able to generate correct P2SH-P2WSH address from given redeem script

can you please provide me the generation code, i am struggling to generate a p2sh-p2wsh address from the given redeem script, actually there is no witness program key given , so is it even possible for me to generate the address which is 32...... in this case, i just wanted to recheck whether my generated address and the given address comes out to be same

Transaction Spec
Private Key 1: 39dc0a9f0b185a2ee56349691f34716e6e0cda06a7f9707742ac113c4e2317bf
Private Key 2: 5077ccd9c558b7d04a81920d38aa11b4a9f9de3b23fab45c3ef28039920fdd6d
Redeem Script (ASM): OP_2 032ff8c5df0bc00fe1ac2319c3b8070d6d1e04cfbf4fedda499ae7b775185ad53b 039bbc8d24f89e5bc44c5b0d1980d6658316a6b2440023117c3c03a4975b04dd56 OP_2 OP_CHECKMULTISIG
Redeem Script (HEX): 5221032ff8c5df0bc00fe1ac2319c3b8070d6d1e04cfbf4fedda499ae7b775185ad53b21039bbc8d24f89e5bc44c5b0d1980d6658316a6b2440023117c3c03a4975b04dd5652ae
Transaction should contain exactly 1 input with:
Outpoint:
Hash: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Index: 0
Sequence: 0xffffffff
Transaction should contain exactly 1 output with:
Value: 0.001
Address: 325UUecEQuyrTd28Xs2hvAxdAjHM7XzqVF
Locktime: 0

i have been doing this in python

# Given Redeem Script (HEX)
redeem_script_hex = "5221032ff8c5df0bc00fe1ac2319c3b8070d6d1e04cfbf4fedda499ae7b775185ad53b21039bbc8d24f89e5bc44c5b0d1980d6658316a6b2440023117c3c03a4975b04dd5652ae"
script_bytes = bytes.fromhex(redeem_script_hex)
sha256_hash = hashlib.sha256(script_bytes).digest()
redeem_script_hash = hashlib.new("ripemd160", sha256_hash).digest()
prefixed_hash = b'\x05' + redeem_script_hash
checksum = hashlib.sha256(hashlib.sha256(prefixed_hash).digest()).digest()[:4]
final_data = prefixed_hash + checksum
address = base58.b58encode(final_data).decode()
print(address)

to which the putput comews to be

h-multisig-tx-jatin-2708/python$ python main.py
39C5GaHDocqYVgyCq2TrMfknTL45LPPcKF

but it should come

Address: 325UUecEQuyrTd28Xs2hvAxdAjHM7XzqVF (as given in ques)

seems like the witness is missing thats why addresses are coming different , can anyone explain...?



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/MyXi9r6
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Do Kwon’s Detention Prolonged Until 2024 As Montenegro Responds To Extradition Requests

Image
According to an International Business Times report , Montenegro’s Supreme Court decided to extend the detention of TerraForm Labs founder and CEO Do Kwon until February 2024, following extradition requests from the United States and South Korea. Closed-Door Discussions Reveal Montenegro’s Plan For Do Kwon Initially set to be extradited to the US on December 15, Do Kwon’s fate turned when the Montenegrin High Court ruled to prolong his stay until February 15, 2024. The decision stems from charges related to the collapse of the TerraUSD stablecoin, which led to significant financial losses. The High Court had previously ordered Kwon’s extradition by Friday, but his defense team appealed the decision in the appellate court in Podgorica, the capital of Montenegro. The Montenegrin Court of Appeal confirmed that Kwon contested the High Court’s ruling, vehemently stating, “I do not submit to the court’s decision.” Recent reports indicate that Montenegro’s Justice Minister, Andrej Mil...
Read more

Sam Bankman-Fried Trial Begins Tomorrow: 3 Reasons Ex-SEC Official Foresees Conviction

Image
The trial of Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of cryptocurrency exchange FTX and hedge fund Alameda Research, is set to commence in New York on Tuesday, October 3.  This comes almost a year after the collapse of both FTX and Alameda Research. The events leading up to the trial paint a picture of alleged fraudulent activities and money laundering that caused significant damage to the businesses involved. Ex-SEC Official’s Bleak Prediction As Sam Bankman-Fried Trial Commences In a nutshell, Alameda Research purportedly took customer deposits from FTX and invested them in fictitious crypto tokens, which derived their value from the confidence in FTX’s operations.  When this confidence waned, FTX and Alameda Research suffered substantial losses, which many argue contributed to a broader disillusionment in the cryptocurrency industry.  Following an investigation, federal authorities uncovered numerous alleged crimes, leading to seven federal fraud and money-laundering cha...
Read more

Future of Bitcoin encryption and security in a QC era

How will the advancement of quantum computing impact the security of Bitcoin, and what steps are necessary to protect the network from this emerging threat? What role could lattice-based encryption play in safeguarding Bitcoin, and which of the current algorithms are best suited for this purpose? How would the implementation of such encryption technology be integrated into the existing Bitcoin infrastructure, and what challenges might arise during this process? What happens to existing addresses that rely on elliptic curve cryptography? Is there a way to seamlessly transition old addresses to the new system, or would users need to actively transfer their funds to new, more secure addresses? How could such a transition be designed to ensure user security while maintaining trust in the network? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/aZeY2fo via IFTTT
Read more