Tangem Wallet Pack of 2 - Secure Crypto Wallet - Trusted Cold Storage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT's &

Tangem Wallet Pack of 2 - Secure Crypto Wallet - Trusted Cold Storage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT's &
Key item features Ultimate Security: Generates a private key that remains on the card, safeguarding crypto and NFTs from hackers with EAL6+ certification and audited firmware. Versatile Compatibility: Manages over 13,000 tokens across 70+ blockchains, supporting DeFi, NFTs, and DeEx without wires, Bluetooth, or USB. Effortless Operation: Utilizes NFC for secure transactions via a mobile device and the Tangem app, enabling buying and selling crypto with various payment methods. Smart Backup: Features a second Tangem Wallet as a backup, eliminating the need for paper, pictures, or seed phrases for recovery. Durable Design: Boasts IP68 protection against environmental conditions, ensuring longevity and robust physical security. Comprehensive Support: Compatible with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, USDT, and over 6,000 cryptocurrencies, integrating with dApps and WalletConnect.

LBANK

Can anyone solve this that i call paradox?

Most of you are familiar with the formula:

s1 x k1 = z1 + r1 x d1 mod n

If you have two of them related like this:

s1 x k1 = z1 + r1 x d1 mod n (1)

s2 x k1 = z2 + r1 x d1 mod n (2)

There is the formula:

(s1 - s2) x k1 = (z1 - z2) mod n (3)

to find,k1.And from that d1.

There also special cases then you can find d1,from the formula:

k2 = k1 - 1 or m,m < n (or)

k2 = k1 /2 or m,m < n.

Also,i read in many posts here,that k1 and k2 or (in special cases) d1 and d2,can not be related in a algebric and logic way,beacouse of course,will be a formula that will find k1,k2,d1 and d2. Now,i found with a simple derivation a formula:

s1 x k1 = z1 + r1 x d1 (4)

s2 x k2 = z2 + r2 x d1 (5)

a x k1 - b x k2 = c (6)

Now the paradox,from my point of view:

I admit that my advanced algebra is weak,but i want to make sure that if someone is better then me can help me to prove i am right or prove me wrong and help me and in the end help you,the reader.

I can prove without,that i call invisible info/stealth info,that this formula is true.By invisible info /stealth info,i mean to have two real or artificial tx (transactions),where i can use invisible info aka real value of k1,k2 or d1,to check the information directly.

But here is the thing: even i can prove in any transactions anywhere,relation between a x k1 and b x k2 is c,by means of numbers,logic and formula(4),(5) and (6) only,without invisible info,i can not extract k1,k2 or d,even in a two related k1,k2 transaction made public here in this forum.

I tried two modes to extract k1,k2 or d,but it gave me zero division. Why,if i can prove with algebra and logic that are related?

I think first because my advanced algebra is not high enough or second can be a rule that can not be broken related with how those equations are made.Can you help me?

Note.I am aware that this kind of info is highly sensitive.For that i not made public how i can prove without invisible info,how can k1 and k2 are related by means of (4),(5) and (6).But as you expect with a bit of thinking you can do,too.If someone can give me the answer in private,please do.



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/mR5MIjS
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Crypto Exec Warns Tokenization Is Moving Faster Than Expected

Bitcoin Mining Could Be Strengthening The Ruble, Russian Central Bank Says

Nigerian SEC Partners With Police To Tackle Crypto Ponzi Schemes – Details