Is using legacy P2SH multisig at derivation m/45' still safe?

The early, now called "legacy", multi-sig didn't really have a standard for derivation as I understand. For example contrarily to native segwit multisig, where m/48'/0'/0'/2' seems used by default by pretty much every software and hardware wallet.

So for example Electrum, if I'm not mistaken, uses m/45'/0 for legacy multisig while a hardware wallet like the Keystone used m/45'.

As a sidenote apparently on the Keystone hardware wallet I cannot even export any "xPub" other than m/45' for Legacy P2SH multi-sig.

I know you can (and I already did) use native segwit multisig but this is not what I'm asking here.

What I want to know is if legacy multisig using m/45' is safe? For example in a 2-of-3 or even 3-of-3 multisig. Would there be any security issue or considerations?

Several wallets (including Copay, Electrum, Sparrow too I think) aren't using that path by default anymore. Is it because it's unsafe?



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/L9bSEkg
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Crypto Exec Warns Tokenization Is Moving Faster Than Expected

Bitcoin Mining Could Be Strengthening The Ruble, Russian Central Bank Says

Nigerian SEC Partners With Police To Tackle Crypto Ponzi Schemes – Details