Tangem Wallet Pack of 2 - Secure Crypto Wallet - Trusted Cold Storage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT's &

Tangem Wallet Pack of 2 - Secure Crypto Wallet - Trusted Cold Storage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT's &
Key item features Ultimate Security: Generates a private key that remains on the card, safeguarding crypto and NFTs from hackers with EAL6+ certification and audited firmware. Versatile Compatibility: Manages over 13,000 tokens across 70+ blockchains, supporting DeFi, NFTs, and DeEx without wires, Bluetooth, or USB. Effortless Operation: Utilizes NFC for secure transactions via a mobile device and the Tangem app, enabling buying and selling crypto with various payment methods. Smart Backup: Features a second Tangem Wallet as a backup, eliminating the need for paper, pictures, or seed phrases for recovery. Durable Design: Boasts IP68 protection against environmental conditions, ensuring longevity and robust physical security. Comprehensive Support: Compatible with Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, XRP, USDT, and over 6,000 cryptocurrencies, integrating with dApps and WalletConnect.

LBANK

BitcoinD Fails to Return Transaction Data After Receiving GetData P2P Message

Question: I’m developing a Neutrino client that communicates with BitcoinD. Most P2P messages are working as expected, but when I send a GetData message for a transaction (Tx type), BitcoinD doesn't respond with the expected transaction data. I’ve verified that the transaction is indeed present on the node. Below is the log from BitcoinD:

2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] received getdata (1 invsz) peer=32  
2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] received getdata for: tx  
c1b5b6fb155a8fd41d241abe5efb5aa9de7c8942fdd923ad1e6d94e9deedc3f9 peer=32

Here are the details of my setup:

BitcoinD version: 24

Configuration:

bitcoind  
-server=1  
-regtest=1  
-rpcauth=:  
-debug=1  
-zmqpubrawblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28334  
-zmqpubrawtx=tcp://0.0.0.0:28335  
-zmqpubhashblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28336  
-txindex=1  
-dnsseed=0  
-upnp=0  
-rpcbind=0.0.0.0  
-rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0  
-rpcport=18443  
-rest  
-listen=1  
-listenonion=0  
-fallbackfee=0.0002  
-blockfilterindex=1  
-peerblockfilters=1  

Has anyone encountered a similar issue? Any suggestions on what could be going wrong here or how I might troubleshoot this further?



from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/UawqMiC
via IFTTT

Popular posts from this blog

Crypto Exec Warns Tokenization Is Moving Faster Than Expected

Bitcoin Mining Could Be Strengthening The Ruble, Russian Central Bank Says

Nigerian SEC Partners With Police To Tackle Crypto Ponzi Schemes – Details