Posts

Bitcoin to usd$$$$$$

I bought a few programs and set them up. I was incapacitated for 12 mos. Recently I had finance tell me I have 1.3 btc that needs to be converted. Is it true you have to pay finance 75 to convert it. They also said my info was breached. What should I do.i don't wanna be scammed from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/bJcpMkf via IFTTT

I came across bitaddress.systems and it does look legit with more resources than bitaddress.org. I would like to know your opinions

I came across this website bitaddress.systems and it does look eerily similar to bitaddress.org but with a lot more resources. They even have an android app downloadable from github. Is the site/app safe to use for the creation of my wallets? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/WbIMAuJ via IFTTT

Does Gap Limit Take into Account the Indexing of Master Keys?

For example, if I were to have a 2 of 2 multisig wallet constructed as follows: wsh(sortedmulti(2,[deadb33f/1,000,000h]xpub.../<0;1>/ ,[deadb33f/0h/1,000,000]xpub.../<0;1>/ )) Would a standard wallet with a gap limit of 20 have trouble finding the balance because of the 1,000,000 index BEFORE the xpubs(assuming there are 100 sats at index xpub/0/0)? from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/H1V82vr via IFTTT

BitcoinD Fails to Return Transaction Data After Receiving GetData P2P Message

Question: I’m developing a Neutrino client that communicates with BitcoinD. Most P2P messages are working as expected, but when I send a GetData message for a transaction (Tx type), BitcoinD doesn't respond with the expected transaction data. I’ve verified that the transaction is indeed present on the node. Below is the log from BitcoinD: 2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] received getdata (1 invsz) peer=32 2024-10-16T11:24:22Z [net] received getdata for: tx c1b5b6fb155a8fd41d241abe5efb5aa9de7c8942fdd923ad1e6d94e9deedc3f9 peer=32 Here are the details of my setup: BitcoinD version: 24 Configuration: bitcoind -server=1 -regtest=1 -rpcauth=: -debug=1 -zmqpubrawblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28334 -zmqpubrawtx=tcp://0.0.0.0:28335 -zmqpubhashblock=tcp://0.0.0.0:28336 -txindex=1 -dnsseed=0 -upnp=0 -rpcbind=0.0.0.0 -rpcallowip=0.0.0.0/0 -rpcport=18443 -rest -listen=1 -listenonion=0 -fallbackfee=0.0002 -blockfilterindex=1 -peerblockfilters=1 Has anyone encou

SegWit Soft / Hard Fork

My question is a continuation of this one: Why non-SegWit nodes do not reject SegWit block since there is no witness? It says: “If so, what prevents it to be spent by anyone not the intended recipient? Most nodes (the ones who have updated) would reject this transaction. Every miner would reject this transaction out of fear that their block (and block reward) would be rejected. You can fork off into a chain that spends those outputs though, if you wanted.” Well if by the old rules the transaction can be spent by anyone, and if pre-segwit node tries to spend it (lawfully), it will be rejected. So how is it a soft fork if old node blocks can be rejected based on nothing? Or definition of a hard fork means that old nodes will reject new node blocks? Love the Optech btw from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/xeysu8h via IFTTT

In what cases is FindAndDelete useful?

In the non-segwit case, FindAndDelete removes signature data from scriptCode. In P2PKH, the signature is not included in the scriptPubKey, so I think the only thing that may actually have signature data removed by FindAndDelete is redeemScript for P2SH. But is there actually a useful use case for including a valid signature within a redeemScript? What was the intention behind introducing the FindAndDelete process? In the following Bitcoin Core's FindAndDelete test case, the public key is recovered from the signature and set to scriptSig. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v28.0/src/test/data/tx_valid.json#L496 from Recent Questions - Bitcoin Stack Exchange https://ift.tt/O87x6As via IFTTT

AVA Chow and low quality answers and posts - instawallet software

I assure you with over 20 years experience with microsoft products and the internet having my forst computer in 1998 I know what im talking about when it come to ithe internet and related. I have a 3.7 gpa from a nice high school near a nasa compaund and 20.5 university honors credits from UALr in Little Rock, Ar. I fail to see what is low quality about my questions and posts related to the instawallet software wallet i used on March 1, 2011. To my knowledge the information i gave is true and correct aside from fraudulent claims stating otherwise i see no reason to grade my post as low quality. I challeng the moderator to have a more open view of the early bitcoin era and accept my information as near fact or fact as stated. please treat me with respect as i do have over 20 years experience with the internet and bough my forst bitcoin on march 1, 2011. Please allow me to receive answers and offer any revision suggestions to fit in your webstites guidelines. from Recent Questions - B